Skip to main content

Integrity

integrity
Pronunciation: \in-ˈte-grə-tē\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English integrite, from Middle French & Latin; Middle French integrité, from Latin integritat-, integritas, from integr-, integer entire
Date: 14th century
Definitions: 1 : firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values : incorruptibility 2 : an unimpaired condition : soundness 3 : the quality or state of being complete or undivided : completeness

Some years ago, my company was undergoing a reorganization and there was an effort to indoctrinate everyone with a new way of "embracing change". We all underwent a series of mandatory EST-like re-education sessions and there was a new kind of language that started to be used in corporate meetings.
Thankfully, that era passed and we are back to using intelligence and common sense. However, there is an interesting phenomenon of rejecting everything from those sessions as by definition, false. Of course, some of the ideas and concepts had value.
In particular, the notion of INTEGRITY.
The word "Integrity" was used in a very specific way. Rather than Moral Value (1) or Unimpared Condition (2), we discussed Integrity in the sense of undividedness (3). I think this has a lot of value as a guiding principle for how one makes personal life choices at all levels of importance.
If I live in or with integrity then my aspirations,thoughts, intentions, actions and reputation are all consistent and aligned. Note that this spans an arc to the future (aspirations) from the past (reputation). Frankly only one of these moments, action, are real. All of the rest are simply mental constructs-the fine line between dreams, plans and memories. Nonetheless, it takes strength and focus to constantly do things there are consistent with our intentions. Assuming that somea mount of planning is given to understanding intentions and aspirations, it means that you have to constantly examine actions to make sure they agree with who we really are.
Its not easy.
The hardest part of this is that these types of evaluations and assesments can be made without assigning moral evaluations or judgement. We can examine the integrity of our actions without thinking "Good" or "Bad". They are what they are.

Comments

Anonymous said…
If only the present is real, then what does it matter that one attempts to align with the last and into the future?

Popular posts from this blog

My First Post

Hmm...How many people have written a journal or diary or blog called "My first entry", or something similar. Well, you have to start somewhere. The key implication of "first" is that it isn't the "last". However, having said that, when I set up this blog, I was imagining all the profound insights I would be able to share with the world. The deep thoughts that I would scribble into my laptop at 3am when I can really see the depths of truth. Flocks of websurfers would come to see if I'd stumbled on something new. An almost as attractive image is that no one would read any of this and it will just be a private place to get things off my chest. That in the writing with the possibility that someone could read it, I would have to be honest and fair and share the things I'm feeling. Now that I'm sitting here, I can't actually think of anything particularly deep to share. Well, after all it isn't 3am yet so not to worry!

Truth and...Orville (?)

When I climbed on this soapbox, I had intended to take a lofty, high minded intellectual view. Alas... Last night I was watching the TV Show "Orville" episode 7 "Majority Rule" and it spoke to exactly the ideas I've been thinking about, so I couldn't resist sharing it. Orville, a Seth MacFarlane project, is a humorous take on Star Trek.  Obviously, spoilers ahead... Majority Rule Imagine a society guided by an absolute democracy. The population can vote yes or no on everything. There are no fixed laws. Actually, the only laws guide how votes are organized. At the age of 18, all citizens are issued and required to wear a little gadget on their chest with an up or down button and a running counts of "likes" vs "dislikes".  At some level (500,000 dislikes ?) individuals start to lose rights - like service at a cafe. At a very high level of 10 million dislikes, "criminals by acclimation" are required to undergo lobotomy-like r...